50% of Uniswap Liquidity Providers Are Losing Money Compared to HODLers: Survey

50% of Uniswap Liquidity Providers Are Losing Money Compared to HODLers: Survey

The perception that every one liquidity suppliers (LPs) make profitable good points for depositing funds throughout numerous decentralized protocols like Uniswap and Compound, amongst others, has been refuted by a brand new research carried out by Topaze Blue and decentralized liquidity platform Bancor.

Liquidity Providers Make Losses

According to the survey shared with CryptoPotato, practically half of the customers offering liquidity on Uniswap V3 at all times find yourself shedding cash as towards making good points from simply holding the crypto belongings.

This is consequently of the impermanent losses (IL) incurred on buying and selling charges throughout numerous swimming pools, the report added.

The research targeted on actions on Uniswap V3, an Ethereum-based DeFi protocol, between May 5, 2021, and September 20, 2021.

During the research, over 17,000 wallets belonging to liquidity suppliers on the platform have been analyzed. Furthermore, a complete of 17 swimming pools, together with MATIC/ETH, COMP/ETH, and USDC/ETH, have been additionally noticed within the research.

Impermanent Losses Surpasses Trading Fees

Of the $108.5 billion buying and selling quantity recorded throughout these swimming pools, buying and selling charges accounted for $199 million. While this might have been main good points for LPs, impermanent losses worn out charge revenue in additional than 80% of the swimming pools, with $260 million incurred in IL alone.

Based on this, customers have been left with a web loss of over $60 million, whereas 49.5% of liquidity suppliers had to accept a loss.

The report famous that for each $100 value of charges, customers suffered an impermanent loss of $180, representing a web loss of $80.

Per the research, the swimming pools that noticed the most important impermanent losses are MATIC/ETH (51%), COMP/ETH (59%), USDC/ETH (62%), COMP/ETH (59%), and MKR/ETH (74%).

“Our core discovering is that total, and for nearly all analyzed swimming pools, impermanent loss surpasses the charges earned throughout this era,” the report famous.

All Trading Styles Affected

The research additionally examined whether or not some LPs made extra revenue than others in phrases of their buying and selling model.

For this phase, the researchers made comparisons between lively customers, merchants who modify their positions extra continuously, and passive customers, and merchants preferring to maintain their belongings for a long run.

However, there was no statistical proof that lively merchants made extra good points than their passive counterparts, as IL surged greater than the charges in all classes.

Interestingly, the one group of customers who made extra good points have been just-in-time (JIT) merchants, who benefitted from offering liquidity for a single block and shortly eradicating their deposits earlier than impermanent losses set in.

SPECIAL OFFER (Sponsored)

Binance Free $100 (Exclusive): Use this hyperlink to register and obtain $100 free and 10% off charges on Binance Futures first month (phrases).

PrimeXBT Special Offer: Use this hyperlink to register & enter POTATO50 code to get 50% free bonus on any deposit up to $1750.

Source link

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*